Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Ethnicity — variable results

Exploration digest for the survey stack behind book/ethnicity.md (Task 167). Grouped by topic; within each variable: question → time series → cohort trajectories → cohort component → period component with time-series overlay.

GSS mode (Task 175): GSS fits use interviewer responses only: 2021 (almost all web) is dropped, and 2022 and 2024 use the in-person and phone respondents, with weights raked to the full sample. Coding: the Hispanic thermometer (VCF0217) is the mean rating in degrees (Task 165); percent cold is the alternate cold. Intermarriage is shown with the alternate oppose [4, 5], as marblk in the race chapter: “favor” dipped in 2021 when “neither” jumped in the GSS’s first web year (2021 is no longer used; the coding is kept). Stereotype items are derived: _rel = 1 if the group is rated closer to the negative pole than White people on the same 7-point scale (lazy, unintelligent, violent); the rich–poor ratings are fit but left out (Allen, 2026-10-14: perceptions of wealth aren’t the point; actual wealth differences come later); part of the ANES decline in “lazier” comes from the reference group, since the share rating White people lazy doubled (8% to 16%, 1992–2024). Discrimination: a great deal or a lot (ANES), a lot (Pew). Influence in American politics is shown as too little (alternate toolittle; VCF9275 is too little by default), for Black, White, Hispanic and Asian people. 2000 asked about influence “in American life and politics”, a different question, and is not included. Sources: ANES items not in the CDF (discrimination, influence, peaceful–violent, and VCF9275 2024) come from the 2012–2024 study files; Pew pew_discrim_hisp is ATP Waves 24.5 (web group), 53, 84, 118, 143, 167, period only (no birth year), so it has no cohort figures. Items with two or three waves (the 1990–2000 GSS ratings, violent, Asian discrimination and influence) show levels across groups; their cohort components are weak. The GSS violence scale runs 1 = violence-prone, 7 = not. For these 2–3-wave series the model line is pulled toward 50% (up to 3 points), so read levels from the points. All fits pass their sampling gates (some after refits at draws 12000).

Full metadata: notebooks/utils.py. Ops: ethnicity_refresh.md.

Figure stems (Task 95 nested): figs/{gss|anes}/{var}/time_model.png, model10_cohort_trajectories.png, model10_cohort_standardized.png, model10_period_standardized[_time_series].png.

Layout template (Task 130 / 148): topic H2 → per-variable H3 with question + four figures. Regenerate with python scripts/gen_chapter_results_md.py ethnicity.

Warmth

VCF0217 — Feeling thermometer: Hispanics

Selected (y=1): [0–97] — Mean rating, degrees

Question

Feeling thermometer: Hispanics / Chicanos / Hispanic-Americans.

Time series

Time series for VCF0217

Figure 1:Time series for VCF0217

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for VCF0217

Figure 2:Cohort trajectories for VCF0217

Cohort component

Cohort component for VCF0217

Figure 3:Cohort component for VCF0217

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for VCF0217

Figure 4:Period component and time series for VCF0217

By respondent race (Other includes Hispanic respondents): time series

By respondent race (Other includes Hispanic respondents): time series for VCF0217

Figure 5:By respondent race (Other includes Hispanic respondents): time series for VCF0217

By respondent race (Other includes Hispanic respondents): period component

By respondent race (Other includes Hispanic respondents): period component for VCF0217

Figure 6:By respondent race (Other includes Hispanic respondents): period component for VCF0217

By respondent race (Other includes Hispanic respondents): cohort component

By respondent race (Other includes Hispanic respondents): cohort component for VCF0217

Figure 7:By respondent race (Other includes Hispanic respondents): cohort component for VCF0217

Social distance — intermarriage

marhisp — Close relative marry a Hispanic American?

Selected (y=1): [4, 5] — Percent opposed

Coding: oppose (alternate coding; the default is [1, 2])

Question

What about having a close relative marry a Hispanic American person? Would you be very in favor of it happening, somewhat in favor, neither in favor nor opposed to it happening, somewhat opposed, or very opposed?

Time series

Time series for marhisp

Figure 8:Time series for marhisp

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for marhisp

Figure 9:Cohort trajectories for marhisp

Cohort component

Cohort component for marhisp

Figure 10:Cohort component for marhisp

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for marhisp

Figure 11:Period component and time series for marhisp

marasian — Close relative marry an Asian American?

Selected (y=1): [4, 5] — Percent opposed

Coding: oppose (alternate coding; the default is [1, 2])

Question

What about having a close relative marry an Asian American person? Would you be very in favor of it happening, somewhat in favor, neither in favor nor opposed to it happening, somewhat opposed, or very opposed?

Time series

Time series for marasian

Figure 12:Time series for marasian

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for marasian

Figure 13:Cohort trajectories for marasian

Cohort component

Cohort component for marasian

Figure 14:Cohort component for marasian

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for marasian

Figure 15:Period component and time series for marasian

Stereotypes — relative to White people (GSS)

workhsp_rel — Hard-working or lazy?

Selected (y=1): [1] — Percent rating Hispanic people lazier than White people

Question

Derived from workhsps and workwhts: 1 if the respondent places Hispanic Americans closer to ‘lazy’ than White people on the 7-point hardworking–lazy scale.

Time series

Time series for workhsp_rel

Figure 16:Time series for workhsp_rel

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for workhsp_rel

Figure 17:Cohort trajectories for workhsp_rel

Cohort component

Cohort component for workhsp_rel

Figure 18:Cohort component for workhsp_rel

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for workhsp_rel

Figure 19:Period component and time series for workhsp_rel

intlhsp_rel — Intelligent or unintelligent?

Selected (y=1): [1] — Percent rating Hispanic people less intelligent than White people

Question

Derived from intlhsps and intlwhts: 1 if the respondent places Hispanic Americans closer to ‘unintelligent’ than White people on the 7-point scale.

Time series

Time series for intlhsp_rel

Figure 20:Time series for intlhsp_rel

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for intlhsp_rel

Figure 21:Cohort trajectories for intlhsp_rel

Cohort component

Cohort component for intlhsp_rel

Figure 22:Cohort component for intlhsp_rel

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for intlhsp_rel

Figure 23:Period component and time series for intlhsp_rel

Stereotypes across groups, 1990–2000 (GSS)

workasn_rel — Hard-working or lazy?

Selected (y=1): [1] — Percent rating Asian people lazier than White people

Question

Derived from workasns and workwhts: 1 if the respondent places Asian Americans closer to ‘lazy’ than White people on the 7-point scale (GSS 1990-2000).

Time series

Time series for workasn_rel

Figure 24:Time series for workasn_rel

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for workasn_rel

Figure 25:Cohort trajectories for workasn_rel

Cohort component

Cohort component for workasn_rel

Figure 26:Cohort component for workasn_rel

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for workasn_rel

Figure 27:Period component and time series for workasn_rel

intlasn_rel — Intelligent or unintelligent?

Selected (y=1): [1] — Percent rating Asian people less intelligent than White people

Question

Derived from intlasns and intlwhts: 1 if the respondent places Asian Americans closer to ‘unintelligent’ than White people on the 7-point scale (GSS 1990-2000).

Time series

Time series for intlasn_rel

Figure 28:Time series for intlasn_rel

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for intlasn_rel

Figure 29:Cohort trajectories for intlasn_rel

Cohort component

Cohort component for intlasn_rel

Figure 30:Cohort component for intlasn_rel

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for intlasn_rel

Figure 31:Period component and time series for intlasn_rel

violasn_rel — Peaceful or violent?

Selected (y=1): [1] — Percent rating Asian people more violent than White people

Question

Derived from violasns and violwhts: 1 if the respondent places Asian Americans closer to ‘violence-prone’ than White people on the 7-point scale (GSS 1990-2000).

Time series

Time series for violasn_rel

Figure 32:Time series for violasn_rel

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for violasn_rel

Figure 33:Cohort trajectories for violasn_rel

Cohort component

Cohort component for violasn_rel

Figure 34:Cohort component for violasn_rel

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for violasn_rel

Figure 35:Period component and time series for violasn_rel

violhsp_rel — Peaceful or violent?

Selected (y=1): [1] — Percent rating Hispanic people more violent than White people

Question

Derived from violhsps and violwhts: 1 if the respondent places Hispanic Americans closer to ‘violence-prone’ than White people on the 7-point scale (GSS 1990-2000).

Time series

Time series for violhsp_rel

Figure 36:Time series for violhsp_rel

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for violhsp_rel

Figure 37:Cohort trajectories for violhsp_rel

Cohort component

Cohort component for violhsp_rel

Figure 38:Cohort component for violhsp_rel

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for violhsp_rel

Figure 39:Period component and time series for violhsp_rel

violblk_rel — Peaceful or violent?

Selected (y=1): [1] — Percent rating Black people more violent than White people

Question

Derived from violblks and violwhts: 1 if the respondent places Black people closer to ‘violence-prone’ than White people on the 7-point scale (GSS 1990-2000).

Time series

Time series for violblk_rel

Figure 40:Time series for violblk_rel

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for violblk_rel

Figure 41:Cohort trajectories for violblk_rel

Cohort component

Cohort component for violblk_rel

Figure 42:Cohort component for violblk_rel

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for violblk_rel

Figure 43:Period component and time series for violblk_rel

workjew_rel — Hard-working or lazy?

Selected (y=1): [1] — Percent rating Jewish people lazier than White people

Question

Derived from workjews and workwhts: 1 if the respondent places Jews closer to ‘lazy’ than White people on the 7-point scale (GSS 1990-2000).

Time series

Time series for workjew_rel

Figure 44:Time series for workjew_rel

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for workjew_rel

Figure 45:Cohort trajectories for workjew_rel

Cohort component

Cohort component for workjew_rel

Figure 46:Cohort component for workjew_rel

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for workjew_rel

Figure 47:Period component and time series for workjew_rel

intljew_rel — Intelligent or unintelligent?

Selected (y=1): [1] — Percent rating Jewish people less intelligent than White people

Question

Derived from intljews and intlwhts: 1 if the respondent places Jews closer to ‘unintelligent’ than White people on the 7-point scale (GSS 1990-2000).

Time series

Time series for intljew_rel

Figure 48:Time series for intljew_rel

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for intljew_rel

Figure 49:Cohort trajectories for intljew_rel

Cohort component

Cohort component for intljew_rel

Figure 50:Cohort component for intljew_rel

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for intljew_rel

Figure 51:Period component and time series for intljew_rel

violjew_rel — Peaceful or violent?

Selected (y=1): [1] — Percent rating Jewish people more violent than White people

Question

Derived from violjews and violwhts: 1 if the respondent places Jews closer to ‘violence-prone’ than White people on the 7-point scale (GSS 1990-2000).

Time series

Time series for violjew_rel

Figure 52:Time series for violjew_rel

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for violjew_rel

Figure 53:Cohort trajectories for violjew_rel

Cohort component

Cohort component for violjew_rel

Figure 54:Cohort component for violjew_rel

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for violjew_rel

Figure 55:Period component and time series for violjew_rel

Stereotypes — relative to White people (ANES)

VCF9272_rel — Hard-working or lazy?

Selected (y=1): [1] — Percent rating Hispanic people lazier than White people

Question

Derived from VCF9272 and VCF9270: 1 if the respondent places Hispanic people closer to ‘lazy’ than White people on the 7-point hardworking–lazy scale.

Time series

Time series for VCF9272_rel

Figure 56:Time series for VCF9272_rel

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for VCF9272_rel

Figure 57:Cohort trajectories for VCF9272_rel

Cohort component

Cohort component for VCF9272_rel

Figure 58:Cohort component for VCF9272_rel

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for VCF9272_rel

Figure 59:Period component and time series for VCF9272_rel

VCF9273_rel — Hard-working or lazy?

Selected (y=1): [1] — Percent rating Asian people lazier than White people

Question

Derived from VCF9273 and VCF9270: 1 if the respondent places Asian people closer to ‘lazy’ than White people on the 7-point hardworking–lazy scale.

Time series

Time series for VCF9273_rel

Figure 60:Time series for VCF9273_rel

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for VCF9273_rel

Figure 61:Cohort trajectories for VCF9273_rel

Cohort component

Cohort component for VCF9273_rel

Figure 62:Cohort component for VCF9273_rel

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for VCF9273_rel

Figure 63:Period component and time series for VCF9273_rel

violent_hisp_rel — Peaceful or violent?

Selected (y=1): [1] — Percent rating Hispanic people more violent than White people

Question

Derived from violent_hisp and violent_white: 1 if the respondent places Hispanic people closer to ‘violent’ than White people on the 7-point peaceful–violent scale.

Time series

Time series for violent_hisp_rel

Figure 64:Time series for violent_hisp_rel

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for violent_hisp_rel

Figure 65:Cohort trajectories for violent_hisp_rel

Cohort component

Cohort component for violent_hisp_rel

Figure 66:Cohort component for violent_hisp_rel

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for violent_hisp_rel

Figure 67:Period component and time series for violent_hisp_rel

violent_asian_rel — Peaceful or violent?

Selected (y=1): [1] — Percent rating Asian people more violent than White people

Question

Derived from violent_asian and violent_white: 1 if the respondent places Asian people closer to ‘violent’ than White people on the 7-point peaceful–violent scale.

Time series

Time series for violent_asian_rel

Figure 68:Time series for violent_asian_rel

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for violent_asian_rel

Figure 69:Cohort trajectories for violent_asian_rel

Cohort component

Cohort component for violent_asian_rel

Figure 70:Cohort component for violent_asian_rel

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for violent_asian_rel

Figure 71:Period component and time series for violent_asian_rel

Perceived discrimination

discrim_hisp — How much discrimination is there against Hispanics?

Selected (y=1): [1, 2] — Percent saying a great deal or a lot

Question

How much discrimination is there in the United States today against Hispanics? A great deal / a lot / a moderate amount / a little / none at all.

Time series

Time series for discrim_hisp

Figure 72:Time series for discrim_hisp

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for discrim_hisp

Figure 73:Cohort trajectories for discrim_hisp

Cohort component

Cohort component for discrim_hisp

Figure 74:Cohort component for discrim_hisp

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for discrim_hisp

Figure 75:Period component and time series for discrim_hisp

discrim_asian — How much discrimination is there against Asians?

Selected (y=1): [1, 2] — Percent saying a great deal or a lot

Question

How much discrimination is there in the United States today against Asians? A great deal / a lot / a moderate amount / a little / none at all.

Time series

Time series for discrim_asian

Figure 76:Time series for discrim_asian

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for discrim_asian

Figure 77:Cohort trajectories for discrim_asian

Cohort component

Cohort component for discrim_asian

Figure 78:Cohort component for discrim_asian

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for discrim_asian

Figure 79:Period component and time series for discrim_asian

pew_discrim_hisp — How much discrimination is there against Hispanics?

Selected (y=1): [1] — Percent saying a lot

Question

Please tell us how much discrimination there is against each of these groups in our society today. Hispanics / Hispanic people. A lot / Some / Only a little / None at all

Time series

Time series for pew_discrim_hisp

Figure 80:Time series for pew_discrim_hisp

Cohort trajectories

Missing figure: figs/pew/pew_discrim_hisp/ (traj). Run the survey pipeline, then regenerate.

Cohort component

Missing figure: figs/pew/pew_discrim_hisp/ (coh). Run the survey pipeline, then regenerate.

Period component (with time series)

Missing figure: figs/pew/pew_discrim_hisp/ (per). Run the survey pipeline, then regenerate.

Influence in American politics

VCF9275 — Do Black people have too little influence in American politics?

Selected (y=1): [3] — Percent saying yes

Question

Would you say that Blacks have too much influence in American politics, just about the right amount of influence in American politics, or too little influence in American politics?

Time series

Time series for VCF9275

Figure 7:Time series for VCF9275

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for VCF9275

Figure 218:Cohort trajectories for VCF9275

Cohort component

Cohort component for VCF9275

Figure 219:Cohort component for VCF9275

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for VCF9275

Figure 220:Period component and time series for VCF9275

influence_white — How much influence do Whites have in politics?

Selected (y=1): [3] — Percent saying too little

Coding: toolittle (alternate coding; the default is [1])

Question

Would you say that whites have too much influence in American politics, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?

Time series

Time series for influence_white

Figure 85:Time series for influence_white

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for influence_white

Figure 86:Cohort trajectories for influence_white

Cohort component

Cohort component for influence_white

Figure 87:Cohort component for influence_white

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for influence_white

Figure 88:Period component and time series for influence_white

influence_hisp — How much influence do Hispanics have in politics?

Selected (y=1): [3] — Percent saying too little

Coding: toolittle (alternate coding; the default is [1])

Question

Would you say that Hispanics have too much influence in American politics, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?

Time series

Time series for influence_hisp

Figure 89:Time series for influence_hisp

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for influence_hisp

Figure 90:Cohort trajectories for influence_hisp

Cohort component

Cohort component for influence_hisp

Figure 91:Cohort component for influence_hisp

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for influence_hisp

Figure 92:Period component and time series for influence_hisp

influence_asian — How much influence do Asians have in politics?

Selected (y=1): [3] — Percent saying too little

Coding: toolittle (alternate coding; the default is [1])

Question

Would you say that Asians have too much influence in American politics, just about the right amount of influence, or too little influence?

Time series

Time series for influence_asian

Figure 93:Time series for influence_asian

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for influence_asian

Figure 94:Cohort trajectories for influence_asian

Cohort component

Cohort component for influence_asian

Figure 95:Cohort component for influence_asian

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for influence_asian

Figure 96:Period component and time series for influence_asian

Multiculturalism (GSS)

meltpot — Should groups keep distinct cultures or blend in?

Selected (y=1): [1, 2, 3] — Percent closer to maintaining distinct cultures (1–3)

Question

Some people say that it is better for America if different racial and ethnic groups maintain their distinct cultures. Others say that it is better if groups change so that they blend into the larger society as in the idea of a melting pot. Score 1 = maintain their distinct cultures, 7 = blend into the larger society.

Time series

Time series for meltpot

Figure 97:Time series for meltpot

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for meltpot

Figure 98:Cohort trajectories for meltpot

Cohort component

Cohort component for meltpot

Figure 99:Cohort component for meltpot

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for meltpot

Figure 100:Period component and time series for meltpot

meltpot1 — Should groups keep distinct customs or blend in?

Selected (y=1): [1] — Percent saying maintain distinct customs

Question

Some people say that it is better for a country if different racial and ethnic groups maintain their distinct customs and traditions. Others say that it is better if these groups adapt and blend into the larger society. Which of these views comes closer to your own?

Time series

Time series for meltpot1

Figure 101:Time series for meltpot1

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for meltpot1

Figure 102:Cohort trajectories for meltpot1

Cohort component

Cohort component for meltpot1

Figure 103:Cohort component for meltpot1

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for meltpot1

Figure 104:Period component and time series for meltpot1

mincult — Should government help minorities preserve their customs?

Selected (y=1): [1, 2] — Percent who agree

Question

Ethnic minorities should be given government assistance to preserve their customs and traditions. Agree strongly / agree / neither / disagree / disagree strongly.

Time series

Time series for mincult

Figure 105:Time series for mincult

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for mincult

Figure 106:Cohort trajectories for mincult

Cohort component

Cohort component for mincult

Figure 107:Cohort component for mincult

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for mincult

Figure 108:Period component and time series for mincult

ethclose — How close do you feel to your ethnic or racial group?

Selected (y=1): [1, 2] — Percent very close or close

Question

How close do you feel to your ethnic or racial group? Very close / close / not very close / not close at all.

Time series

Time series for ethclose

Figure 109:Time series for ethclose

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for ethclose

Figure 110:Cohort trajectories for ethclose

Cohort component

Cohort component for ethclose

Figure 111:Cohort component for ethclose

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for ethclose

Figure 112:Period component and time series for ethclose