Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Poverty and wealth — variable results

Exploration digest for the survey stack behind book/poverty.md (Task 127 / Task 130). Grouped by topic; within each variable: question → time series → cohort trajectories → cohort component → period component with time-series overlay.

Coding: Policy and egalitarianism items use conservative y=1 (e.g. spend less on welfare / aid to the poor). Descriptive items (satfin, finrela, class, goodlife, parsol, dwelown, VCF0148) are substantive cuts, not left–right.

Full metadata: notebooks/utils.py. Ops: poverty_refresh.md.

Figure stems (Task 95 nested): figs/{gss|anes}/{var}/time_model.png, model10_cohort_trajectories.png, model10_cohort_standardized.png, model10_period_standardized[_time_series].png.

Layout template (Task 130 / 148): topic H2 → per-variable H3 with question + four figures. Regenerate with python scripts/gen_chapter_results_md.py poverty.

Welfare spending & affect

natfare — Welfare spending?

Selected (y=1): [3] — Percent saying too much

Question

Tell me whether you think we’re spending too much money on welfare, too little money, or about the right amount.

Time series

Time series for natfare

Figure 1:Time series for natfare

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for natfare

Figure 2:Cohort trajectories for natfare

Cohort component

Cohort component for natfare

Figure 3:Cohort component for natfare

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for natfare

Figure 4:Period component and time series for natfare

natfarey — Assistance to the poor?

Selected (y=1): [3] — Percent saying too much

Question

Tell me whether you think we’re spending too much money on assistance to the poor, too little money, or about the right amount.

Time series

Time series for natfarey

Figure 5:Time series for natfarey

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for natfarey

Figure 6:Cohort trajectories for natfarey

Cohort component

Cohort component for natfarey

Figure 7:Cohort component for natfarey

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for natfarey

Figure 8:Period component and time series for natfarey

VCF0886 — Federal spending: aid to the poor?

Selected (y=1): [3] — Percent saying decrease aid to the poor

Question

Should federal spending on aid to the poor be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?

Time series

Time series for VCF0886

Figure 9:Time series for VCF0886

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for VCF0886

Figure 10:Cohort trajectories for VCF0886

Cohort component

Cohort component for VCF0886

Figure 11:Cohort component for VCF0886

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for VCF0886

Figure 12:Period component and time series for VCF0886

VCF0220 — Feeling thermometer: people on welfare

Selected (y=1): [0–49] — Percent cold/dislike

Question

Feeling thermometer: people on welfare.

Time series

Time series for VCF0220

Figure 13:Time series for VCF0220

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for VCF0220

Figure 14:Cohort trajectories for VCF0220

Cohort component

Cohort component for VCF0220

Figure 15:Cohort component for VCF0220

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for VCF0220

Figure 16:Period component and time series for VCF0220

Inequality & equal opportunity

eqwlth — Should govt reduce income differences?

Selected (y=1): [5, 6, 7] — Percent opposing reducing income differences (5–7)

Question

Some people think that the government in Washington ought to reduce the income differences between the rich and the poor, perhaps by raising the taxes of wealthy families or by giving income assistance to the poor. Others think that the government should not concern itself with reducing this income difference between the rich and the poor. Where would you place yourself on this scale (1 = government should reduce differences, 7 = government should not concern itself)?

Time series

Time series for eqwlth

Figure 17:Time series for eqwlth

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for eqwlth

Figure 18:Cohort trajectories for eqwlth

Cohort component

Cohort component for eqwlth

Figure 19:Cohort component for eqwlth

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for eqwlth

Figure 20:Period component and time series for eqwlth

VCF9013 — Society ensure equal opportunity?

Selected (y=1): [4, 5] — Percent disagreeing society should ensure equal opportunity

Question

Our society should do whatever is necessary to make sure that everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed. (Agree strongly … disagree strongly.)

Time series

Time series for VCF9013

Figure 21:Time series for VCF9013

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for VCF9013

Figure 22:Cohort trajectories for VCF9013

Cohort component

Cohort component for VCF9013

Figure 23:Cohort component for VCF9013

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for VCF9013

Figure 24:Period component and time series for VCF9013

VCF9015 — Unequal chance a big problem?

Selected (y=1): [4, 5] — Percent disagreeing unequal chance is a big problem

Question

One of the big problems in this country is that we don’t give everyone an equal chance. (Agree strongly … disagree strongly.)

Time series

Time series for VCF9015

Figure 25:Time series for VCF9015

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for VCF9015

Figure 26:Cohort trajectories for VCF9015

Cohort component

Cohort component for VCF9015

Figure 27:Cohort component for VCF9015

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for VCF9015

Figure 28:Period component and time series for VCF9015

VCF9016 — OK if some have more chance?

Selected (y=1): [1, 2] — Percent agreeing unequal chance is not a big problem

Question

It is not really that big a problem if some people have more of a chance in life than others. (Agree strongly … disagree strongly.)

Time series

Time series for VCF9016

Figure 29:Time series for VCF9016

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for VCF9016

Figure 30:Cohort trajectories for VCF9016

Cohort component

Cohort component for VCF9016

Figure 31:Cohort component for VCF9016

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for VCF9016

Figure 32:Period component and time series for VCF9016

VCF9017 — Worry less about equality?

Selected (y=1): [1, 2] — Percent agreeing we should worry less about equality

Question

This country would be better off if we worried less about how equal people are. (Agree strongly … disagree strongly.)

Time series

Time series for VCF9017

Figure 33:Time series for VCF9017

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for VCF9017

Figure 34:Cohort trajectories for VCF9017

Cohort component

Cohort component for VCF9017

Figure 35:Cohort component for VCF9017

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for VCF9017

Figure 36:Period component and time series for VCF9017

Government economic role

VCF0809 — Guaranteed jobs and income?

Selected (y=1): [5, 6, 7] — Percent favoring let each person get ahead (5–7)

Question

Some people feel that the government in Washington should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living. Others think the government should just let each person get ahead on their own. Where would you place yourself on this scale (1 = government see to job and good standard of living, 7 = let each person get ahead on their own)?

Time series

Time series for VCF0809

Figure 37:Time series for VCF0809

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for VCF0809

Figure 38:Cohort trajectories for VCF0809

Cohort component

Cohort component for VCF0809

Figure 39:Cohort component for VCF0809

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for VCF0809

Figure 40:Period component and time series for VCF0809

VCF0839 — Government services vs spending?

Selected (y=1): [1, 2, 3] — Percent favoring fewer government services (1–3)

Question

Some people think the government should provide fewer services, even in areas such as health and education, in order to reduce spending. Other people feel it is important for the government to provide many more services even if it means an increase in spending. Where would you place yourself on this scale (1 = many fewer services, 7 = many more services)?

Time series

Time series for VCF0839

Figure 41:Time series for VCF0839

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for VCF0839

Figure 42:Cohort trajectories for VCF0839

Cohort component

Cohort component for VCF0839

Figure 43:Cohort component for VCF0839

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for VCF0839

Figure 44:Period component and time series for VCF0839

VCF0806 — Government health insurance?

Selected (y=1): [5, 6, 7] — Percent favoring private health insurance (5–7)

Question

There is much concern about the rapid rise in medical and hospital costs. Some feel there should be a government insurance plan which would cover all medical and hospital expenses. Others feel that medical expenses should be paid by individuals and through private insurance. Where would you place yourself on this scale (1 = government insurance plan, 7 = private insurance plan)?

Time series

Time series for VCF0806

Figure 45:Time series for VCF0806

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for VCF0806

Figure 46:Cohort trajectories for VCF0806

Cohort component

Cohort component for VCF0806

Figure 47:Cohort component for VCF0806

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for VCF0806

Figure 48:Period component and time series for VCF0806

Mobility & merit

getahead — Get ahead by hard work?

Selected (y=1): [1] — Percent saying hard work most important

Question

Some people say that people get ahead by their own hard work; others say that lucky breaks or help from other people are more important. Which do you think is most important?

Time series

Time series for getahead

Figure 49:Time series for getahead

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for getahead

Figure 50:Cohort trajectories for getahead

Cohort component

Cohort component for getahead

Figure 51:Cohort component for getahead

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for getahead

Figure 52:Period component and time series for getahead

goodlife — Good chance of improving living standard?

Selected (y=1): [1, 2] — Percent agreeing living standard can improve

Question

The way things are in America, people like me and my family have a good chance of improving our standard of living — do you agree or disagree?

Time series

Time series for goodlife

Figure 53:Time series for goodlife

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for goodlife

Figure 54:Cohort trajectories for goodlife

Cohort component

Cohort component for goodlife

Figure 55:Cohort component for goodlife

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for goodlife

Figure 56:Period component and time series for goodlife

parsol — Living standard vs parents?

Selected (y=1): [1, 2] — Percent saying better than parents

Question

Compared to your parents when they were the age you are now, do you think your own standard of living now is much better, somewhat better, about the same, somewhat worse, or much worse than theirs was?

Time series

Time series for parsol

Figure 57:Time series for parsol

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for parsol

Figure 58:Cohort trajectories for parsol

Cohort component

Cohort component for parsol

Figure 59:Cohort component for parsol

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for parsol

Figure 60:Period component and time series for parsol

Class, finances & housing

class — Subjective social class?

Selected (y=1): [2] — Percent identifying as working class

Question

If you were asked to use one of four names for your social class, which would you say you belong in: the lower class, the working class, the middle class, or the upper class?

Time series

Time series for class

Figure 61:Time series for class

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for class

Figure 62:Cohort trajectories for class

Cohort component

Cohort component for class

Figure 63:Cohort component for class

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for class

Figure 64:Period component and time series for class

VCF0148 — Subjective social class?

Selected (y=1): [0, 1, 2, 3] — Percent lower or working class

Question

There’s been some talk these days about different social classes. Most people say they belong either to the middle class or the working class. Do you ever think of yourself as belonging in one of these classes? Which one?

Time series

Time series for VCF0148

Figure 65:Time series for VCF0148

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for VCF0148

Figure 66:Cohort trajectories for VCF0148

Cohort component

Cohort component for VCF0148

Figure 67:Cohort component for VCF0148

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for VCF0148

Figure 68:Period component and time series for VCF0148

finrela — Family income vs American families?

Selected (y=1): [1, 2] — Percent saying below or far below average

Question

Compared with American families in general, would you say your family income is far below average, below average, average, above average, or far above average?

Time series

Time series for finrela

Figure 69:Time series for finrela

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for finrela

Figure 70:Cohort trajectories for finrela

Cohort component

Cohort component for finrela

Figure 71:Cohort component for finrela

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for finrela

Figure 72:Period component and time series for finrela

satfin — Satisfied with financial situation?

Selected (y=1): [1] — Percent pretty well satisfied

Question

We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. So far as you and your family are concerned, would you say that you are pretty well satisfied with your present financial situation, more or less satisfied, or not satisfied at all?

Time series

Time series for satfin

Figure 73:Time series for satfin

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for satfin

Figure 74:Cohort trajectories for satfin

Cohort component

Cohort component for satfin

Figure 75:Cohort component for satfin

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for satfin

Figure 76:Period component and time series for satfin

dwelown — Own or rent home?

Selected (y=1): [1] — Percent who own or are buying

Question

(Do you/Does your family) own your (home/apartment), pay rent, or what?

Time series

Time series for dwelown

Figure 77:Time series for dwelown

Cohort trajectories

Cohort trajectories for dwelown

Figure 78:Cohort trajectories for dwelown

Cohort component

Cohort component for dwelown

Figure 79:Cohort component for dwelown

Period component (with time series)

Period component and time series for dwelown

Figure 80:Period component and time series for dwelown