Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Temporal Analysis: Evolution of Health Patterns Over Time

Purpose

This document examines how the relationships between health indicators and gender gaps in Life Expectancy (LE) and Healthy Life Expectancy (HALE) have evolved over time. By analyzing data from different time periods (2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, 2019), we can identify temporal trends in:

This temporal analysis serves to:

Temporal Analysis Framework

For each time period, we examine the following to understand how health patterns have evolved:

Indicator Importance Over Time:

Counterfactual Analysis Over Time:

Key Questions for Temporal Analysis:

  1. How have the most important health indicators changed over time?

  2. What do changes in indicator importance tell us about evolving health patterns?

  3. How have intervention opportunities (counterfactual effects) evolved?

  4. Are there clear temporal trends suggesting improvements or deteriorations in specific areas?

  5. What do these changes indicate about the evolution of gender health gaps?

Temporal Evolution: 2000 to 2019

This section presents results chronologically from 2000 to 2019, allowing us to observe how health patterns and their relationships to gender gaps have evolved over the past two decades. Each analysis uses the most recent year of data available for each country up to the specified cutoff year, excluding 2020+ data to avoid COVID-19 pandemic distortions.


2000: Early 2000s Health Patterns

Time Period: 2000
Context: This represents health patterns at the turn of the millennium, providing a baseline for understanding how health indicators and their relationships to gender gaps have evolved over the subsequent two decades.

Life Expectancy Gap Model (2000)

Model Performance:

Top Indicators by Importance:

  1. Cardiovascular: 17.6 (Mid: 17.6, Gap: 0.0143)

  2. Neoplasms: 8.02 (Mid: 0, Gap: 8.02)

  3. UnintentionalInjury: 7.01 (Mid: 2.49, Gap: 4.52)

  4. Homicide: 5.31 (Mid: 2.17, Gap: 3.14)

  5. ChronicRespiratory: 4.44 (Mid: 2.05, Gap: 2.4)

  6. Suicide: 3.87 (Mid: 1.51, Gap: 2.36)

  7. RoadTraffic: 1.8 (Mid: 0.699, Gap: 1.1)

  8. Alcohol: 1.24 (Mid: 0.529, Gap: 0.708)

  9. LiverDisease: 1.08 (Mid: 0.436, Gap: 0.64)

  10. Diabetes: 0.544 (Mid: 0.544, Gap: 0)

Counterfactual Analysis (USA):

Key Findings:

Interpretation of 2000 Patterns:

HALE Gap Model (2000)

Model Performance:

Top Indicators by Importance:

  1. Cardiovascular: 13.9 (Mid: 13.9, Gap: 0)

  2. Neoplasms: 13.8 (Mid: 2.52, Gap: 11.2)

  3. UnintentionalInjury: 5.71 (Mid: 1.18, Gap: 4.53)

  4. ChronicRespiratory: 5.01 (Mid: 4.1, Gap: 0.911)

  5. Suicide: 3.05 (Mid: 1.26, Gap: 1.79)

  6. LiverDisease: 1.95 (Mid: 0.733, Gap: 1.21)

  7. Homicide: 1.84 (Mid: 0.637, Gap: 1.2)

  8. Alcohol: 1.51 (Mid: 0.218, Gap: 1.3)

  9. Diabetes: 0.985 (Mid: 0.618, Gap: 0.366)

  10. RoadTraffic: 0.905 (Mid: 0.503, Gap: 0.402)

Counterfactual Analysis (USA):

Key Findings:

Interpretation of 2000 Patterns:


2005: Mid-2000s Health Patterns

Time Period: 2005
Context: Five years after 2000, we observe how health patterns and their relationships to gender gaps have evolved.

Life Expectancy Gap Model (2005)

Model Performance:

Top Indicators by Importance:

  1. Cardiovascular: 22.2 (Mid: 22.2, Gap: 0)

  2. Neoplasms: 12.8 (Mid: 0, Gap: 12.8)

  3. UnintentionalInjury: 11.1 (Mid: 0, Gap: 11.1)

  4. ChronicRespiratory: 4.75 (Mid: 2.37, Gap: 2.37)

  5. Suicide: 3.26 (Mid: 1.93, Gap: 1.34)

  6. Homicide: 2.67 (Mid: 2.48, Gap: 0.189)

  7. LiverDisease: 2.24 (Mid: 0, Gap: 2.24)

  8. Alcohol: 1.38 (Mid: 0, Gap: 1.38)

  9. RoadTraffic: 0.751 (Mid: 0.751, Gap: 0)

  10. Diabetes: 0.636 (Mid: 0.636, Gap: 0)

Counterfactual Analysis (USA):

Key Findings:

Changes from 2000:

Interpretation of 2005 Patterns:

HALE Gap Model (2005)

Model Performance:

Top Indicators by Importance:

  1. Cardiovascular: 30.0 (Mid: 30.0, Gap: 0)

  2. Neoplasms: 13.7 (Mid: 2.92, Gap: 10.8)

  3. UnintentionalInjury: 8.96 (Mid: 2.26, Gap: 6.7)

  4. ChronicRespiratory: 5.69 (Mid: 2.29, Gap: 3.41)

  5. Suicide: 2.69 (Mid: 0.9, Gap: 1.79)

  6. Alcohol: 2.0 (Mid: 0.823, Gap: 1.18)

  7. Homicide: 1.99 (Mid: 0.913, Gap: 1.08)

  8. RoadTraffic: 1.64 (Mid: 0.8, Gap: 0.844)

  9. LiverDisease: 1.48 (Mid: 0.752, Gap: 0.725)

  10. Diabetes: 0.781 (Mid: 0.781, Gap: 0)

Counterfactual Analysis (USA):

Key Findings:

Changes from 2000:

Interpretation of 2005 Patterns:


2010: Early 2010s Health Patterns

Time Period: 2010
Context: A decade after 2000, we observe continued evolution of health patterns and their relationships to gender gaps.

Life Expectancy Gap Model (2010)

Model Performance:

Top Indicators by Importance:

  1. Neoplasms: 17.0 (Mid: 1.12, Gap: 15.9)

  2. UnintentionalInjury: 8.68 (Mid: 0, Gap: 8.68)

  3. ChronicRespiratory: 6.0 (Mid: 3.74, Gap: 2.25)

  4. LiverDisease: 2.34 (Mid: 0.475, Gap: 1.86)

  5. Alcohol: 2.05 (Mid: 0.354, Gap: 1.7)

  6. Suicide: 1.82 (Mid: 0.801, Gap: 1.02)

  7. Homicide: 1.77 (Mid: 0.821, Gap: 0.948)

  8. Diabetes: 1.26 (Mid: 0.779, Gap: 0.485)

  9. RoadTraffic: 0.681 (Mid: 0.678, Gap: 0.0027)

Counterfactual Analysis (USA):

Key Findings:

Changes from 2005:

Interpretation of 2010 Patterns:

HALE Gap Model (2010)

Model Performance:

Top Indicators by Importance:

  1. Cardiovascular: 24.0 (Mid: 24.0, Gap: 0)

  2. Neoplasms: 11.3 (Mid: 0, Gap: 11.3)

  3. ChronicRespiratory: 5.36 (Mid: 3.94, Gap: 1.42)

  4. UnintentionalInjury: 5.32 (Mid: 0, Gap: 5.32)

  5. Suicide: 3.18 (Mid: 1.34, Gap: 1.85)

  6. Homicide: 2.69 (Mid: 1.12, Gap: 1.56)

  7. LiverDisease: 2.3 (Mid: 0.824, Gap: 1.47)

  8. Alcohol: 1.48 (Mid: 0.279, Gap: 1.2)

  9. RoadTraffic: 1.05 (Mid: 0.71, Gap: 0.337)

  10. Diabetes: 0.789 (Mid: 0.777, Gap: 0.0116)

Counterfactual Analysis (USA):

Key Findings:

Changes from 2005:

Interpretation of 2010 Patterns:


2015: Mid-2010s Health Patterns

Time Period: 2015
Context: Approaching the end of the analysis period, we observe continued evolution toward more recent patterns.

Life Expectancy Gap Model (2015)

Model Performance:

Top Indicators by Importance:

  1. Neoplasms: 10.6 (Mid: 0, Gap: 10.6)

  2. UnintentionalInjury: 7.23 (Mid: 0, Gap: 7.23)

  3. ChronicRespiratory: 4.31 (Mid: 2.59, Gap: 1.72)

  4. Suicide: 2.3 (Mid: 0.426, Gap: 1.87)

  5. Alcohol: 1.52 (Mid: 0.0209, Gap: 1.5)

  6. LiverDisease: 1.4 (Mid: 0.14, Gap: 1.26)

  7. RoadTraffic: 0.882 (Mid: 0.391, Gap: 0.491)

  8. Diabetes: 0.55 (Mid: 0, Gap: 0.55)

  9. Homicide: 0.522 (Mid: 0.0802, Gap: 0.442)

Counterfactual Analysis (USA):

Key Findings:

Changes from 2010:

Interpretation of 2015 Patterns:

HALE Gap Model (2015)

Model Performance:

Top Indicators by Importance:

  1. Cardiovascular: 13.9 (Mid: 13.9, Gap: 0)

  2. Neoplasms: 13.8 (Mid: 2.52, Gap: 11.2)

  3. UnintentionalInjury: 5.71 (Mid: 1.18, Gap: 4.53)

  4. ChronicRespiratory: 5.01 (Mid: 4.1, Gap: 0.911)

  5. Suicide: 3.05 (Mid: 1.26, Gap: 1.79)

  6. LiverDisease: 1.95 (Mid: 0.733, Gap: 1.21)

  7. Homicide: 1.84 (Mid: 0.637, Gap: 1.2)

  8. Alcohol: 1.51 (Mid: 0.218, Gap: 1.3)

  9. Diabetes: 0.985 (Mid: 0.618, Gap: 0.366)

  10. RoadTraffic: 0.905 (Mid: 0.503, Gap: 0.402)

Counterfactual Analysis (USA):

Key Findings:

Changes from 2010:

Interpretation of 2015 Patterns:


2019: Pre-Pandemic Health Patterns

Time Period: 2019
Context: The most recent pre-pandemic year, representing current health patterns and relationships before COVID-19 disruptions.

Life Expectancy Gap Model (2019)

Model Performance:

Top Indicators by Importance:

  1. Neoplasms: 11.4 (Mid: 0, Gap: 11.4)

  2. UnintentionalInjury: 4.93 (Mid: 0, Gap: 4.93)

  3. ChronicRespiratory: 2.22 (Mid: 1.42, Gap: 0.802)

  4. LiverDisease: 2.08 (Mid: 0.418, Gap: 1.67)

  5. Homicide: 1.84 (Mid: 0.869, Gap: 0.966)

  6. Suicide: 1.82 (Mid: 0, Gap: 1.82)

  7. Alcohol: 1.53 (Mid: 0.281, Gap: 1.25)

  8. Diabetes: 0.848 (Mid: 0, Gap: 0.848)

  9. RoadTraffic: 0.442 (Mid: 0.442, Gap: 0)

Counterfactual Analysis (USA):

Key Findings:

Changes from 2015:

Interpretation of 2019 Patterns:

HALE Gap Model (2019)

Model Performance:

Top Indicators by Importance:

  1. Neoplasms: 28.2 (Mid: 15.3, Gap: 12.8)

  2. UnintentionalInjury: 5.69 (Mid: 3.37, Gap: 2.31)

  3. Cardiovascular: 5.55 (Mid: 5.24, Gap: 0.306)

  4. ChronicRespiratory: 5.22 (Mid: 4.42, Gap: 0.801)

  5. Homicide: 3.92 (Mid: 1.44, Gap: 2.48)

  6. Suicide: 2.96 (Mid: 1.05, Gap: 1.9)

  7. LiverDisease: 2.52 (Mid: 1.26, Gap: 1.26)

  8. Alcohol: 1.73 (Mid: 0.491, Gap: 1.23)

  9. Diabetes: 1.69 (Mid: 0.934, Gap: 0.755)

  10. RoadTraffic: 0.468 (Mid: 0.468, Gap: 0)

Counterfactual Analysis (USA):

Key Findings:

Changes from 2015:

Interpretation of 2019 Patterns:


Summary and Conclusions: Evolution of Health Patterns Over Time

Key Temporal Changes: What Has Changed Over Two Decades?

Major Shifts in Indicator Importance:

1. The Rise of Neoplasms (Cancer):

2. The Decline of Cardiovascular Disease:

3. The Evolution of Homicide:

4. The Decline of Road Traffic Injuries:

5. The Stability of Suicide:

Evolution of Intervention Opportunities

Increasing Potential for Gap Reduction:

Shifting Intervention Priorities:

2000-2005 Period:

2010-2015 Period:

2019 (Current Patterns):

What These Changes Tell Us About Health Evolution

1. Cancer Has Become the Dominant Health Issue: The dramatic increase in Neoplasms importance, particularly in the HALE model, suggests that:

2. Cardiovascular Health Improvements: The decline in Cardiovascular importance suggests:

3. Suicide Prevention Has Become More Critical: The increasing counterfactual effects for Suicide, despite relatively stable importance, suggests:

4. Overall Health Patterns Have Shifted: The changes in indicator importance and counterfactual effects indicate:

Implications for Policy and Intervention

Priority Areas for 2019 and Beyond:

  1. Suicide Prevention: Highest intervention potential for both HALE and LE gaps

  2. Cancer Prevention and Treatment: Dominant factor in HALE gaps, important for LE gaps

  3. Unintentional Injuries: Consistently important across time periods

  4. Homicide Prevention: Regained importance by 2019, requiring renewed attention

Areas Showing Improvement:

  1. Cardiovascular Disease: Declined in importance, suggesting successful interventions

  2. Road Traffic Injuries: Declined in importance, reflecting safety improvements

Temporal Stability Assessment:


Notes